remote control.
9. Light weight fiber optic cable
for reliable control link in EMI areas.
10. Internal battery power and
radio control, long-term operation.
11. Able to ascend and descend
stairs.
12. Able to traverse debris and
uneven surfaces.
13. Manipulator arm to pick up
or deliver items, break glass, hold
camera, etc.
14. Weatherized for rain, snow,
or long sun exposure.
Variations In
Requirements Create
A Unique Robot
These are just a few of the
features that officers might want in a
law enforcement robot. These can be
further divided into subcategories with
more specific requirements for individual applications. For example, a pan
and tilt TV camera base can be
added, as well as a variable zoom lens
or special lighting to the TV system.
A particular agency may desire a
manipulator arm that can reach up to
six feet or more with a specified
payload capacity and be mounted on
a swivel base. The robot itself may
need to be configured to raise its
entire body structure such as with
some Remotec Andros models. The
Port of Seattle’s robot for example,
has the ability to elevate the manipulator and TV camera high enough to be
able to open and inspect overhead
bins in aircraft cabins. Figure 2 shows
the Andros in its elevated position at
the recent SRS meeting.
Other groups may want tracked
mobility for climbing stairs or a more
common rubber-tired base. A large
van with multiple control panels may
appeal to a larger law enforcement
agency with a larger, more functional
robot whereas a small suitcase-size
control panel may appeal to others.
Civilian agencies may need just a
simple mobile TV platform to assess
certain dangerous or inaccessible
locations. Other police agencies may
want to remotely ‘enter’ an active or
abandoned meth lab that contains
vast quantities of volatile gasses and
liquids and be able to measure these
gases and safely visualize the interior.
Refineries and chemical industries may
want to enter into a HAZMAT area to
determine types and levels of hazardous materials. Seemingly innocent,
abandoned packages need to be
safely handled and examined, and
possibly destroyed with a disrupter or
disposed of. Hostage situations or
unsecured crime scenes may require
a robot to enter the suspect’s area
and set up negotiations between the
suspect and police personnel.
In many cases, the robot may only
be used a few times a year, and may
sit in a special van or closet, waiting
for that call to action. These robots
must work properly when the need
arises, and preventative maintenance
will be required. Periodic activation
of the systems is a must to assure
availability when needed and some
types of battery systems may require
a constant trickle charge.
One way that many agencies
keep their operators familiar with
the robot’s systems and operational
methods is to take the robot to area
schools, civic groups, and various government agencies for ‘show and tell.’
The operator’s skills are honed, the
tax payers get a chance to see what
“X” amount of dollars bought for
them, and the various teams get a
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 2.
chance to proudly ‘strut their stuff.’
The Remotec
Andros Robot
There are many American
companies that make very capable
and widely-used robots for police and
law enforcement work, but two seem
to stand out as very identifiable in
popularity. Northrop Grumman’s
Remotec Division (formed in 1980)
makes the Andros series of robots
that I’ve already mentioned. There are
FIGURE 4.
SERVO 07.2009
79