Predicting the Future
Using fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) to view blood flow in the
brain, medical researchers can determine how someone will react to a stimulus
before that person is consciously aware of their reaction. That is, our brain pre-computes the necessary neuromuscular signals to, say, avoid a slap to the wrist
before we consciously move our hand to avoid that slap. In this way, we
subconsciously predict the future. This makes sense, if you think about it. Because
the propagation of signals in our biochemical communications network is orders of
magnitude slower than electrical signals in a length of copper wire, our movements
would be erratic and clumsy without some preparation time.
Long before these discoveries were made about the human brain, roboticists
were using various methods of predicting the future so that the movements of their
robots could be smooth, precise, and executed in the proper order. Consider the
Proportional, Integral, Derivative (PID) controller. The three components of PID
control can be combined in various ways, with different emphasis on each
component to predict the future speed of a basic carpet roamer or velocity of a
military drone.
Depending on the application, the three components of PID control can be
combined in various ways and with different emphasis on each component. That is,
a Proportional (P) controller might be sufficient for a carpet roamer, while a
Proportional-Integral (PI) controller might be best for a quadcopter. Proportional
control — when used with the appropriate proportion constant and set point
correction — can provide much smoother speed. A major limitation of a P controller
is an initial period of instability, where predictions about future speed vary widely.
A PI control addresses the instability of the purely proportional control scheme
by adding a term that represents the sum of the difference between desired and
actual speed over time. Because the integral term reflects the difference between
actual and desired speed over time, proportional integral control predicts future
Mind / Iron
by Bryan Bergeron, Editor ;
Published Monthly By
T & L Publications, Inc.
430 Princeland Ct., Corona, CA 92879-1300
(951) 371-8497
FAX (951) 371-3052
Webstore Only 1-800-783-4624
www.servomagazine.com
Subscriptions
Toll Free 1-877-525-2539
Outside US 1-818-487-4545
P.O. Box 15277, N. Hollywood, CA 91615
PUBLISHER
Larry Lemieux
publisher@servomagazine.com
ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER
Robin Lemieux
robin@servomagazine.com
EDITOR
Bryan Bergeron
techedit-servo@yahoo.com
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
Jeff Eckert Jenn Eckert
Tom Carroll Kevin Berry
Dennis Clark R. Steven Rainwater
Michael Simpson Bryce Woolley
Evan Woolley Morgan Berry
Mike Jeffries Matt Spurk
John Blankenship Samuel Mishal
Dan Albert Paul Verhage
ADVERTISING SALES EXECUTIVE
Richard Lockhart
richard@servomagazine.com
CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT
subscribe@servomagazine.com
MARKETING COORDINATOR
WEBSTORE
Brian Kirkpatrick
sales@servomagazine.com
WEB CONTENT
Michael Kaudze
website@servomagazine.com
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
Debbie Stauffacher
PRODUCTION
Sean Lemieux
Copyright 2013 by
T & L Publications, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
All advertising is subject to publisher’s approval.
We are not responsible for mistakes, misprints,
or typographical errors. SERVO Magazine assumes
no responsibility for the availability or condition of
advertised items or for the honesty of the
advertiser. The publisher makes no claims for the
legality of any item advertised in SERVO. This is the
sole responsibility of the advertiser.Advertisers and
their agencies agree to indemnify and protect the
publisher from any and all claims, action, or expense
arising from advertising placed in SERVO. Please
send all editorial correspondence, UPS, overnight
mail, and artwork to: 430 Princeland Court,
Corona, CA 92879.
Printed in the USA on SFI & FSC stock.
ERVO FOR THE ROBOT INNOVATOR
6 SERVO 12.2013
Continued on page 34